Free Essays on Theatricallity In The Ancient World

Theatricality in the Ancient World On November 19, Professor William Slater spoke of how theatre was in the ancient world and how it is in modern day. In the medieval days the text was extremely important and in present day it is the other away around – it is dramatics over text. Professor Slater touched on the loss of accent on texts, the influence of archeology on theatre, and the advent of social science on theatre. Firstly, in the past, up until probably about 1970, the text/script given to actors was more so read than it was acted. For example, before you would chose when a character entered and exited. And on the side of the margin it would be written, â€Å"now Helen will exit†. This had to be improved and in coming years, it did, and only got better with time. He also spoke of dynamism. Mainly, the same script and text would be read but with more enthusiasm or more expression. For instance, â€Å"isn’t it a surprise that I’m home?†. Depending on how the text was expressed would make a huge difference on the effect the same text would have, and would basically create better drama. Secondly, he spoke of the influence of archeology on theatre. At first the stages were immensely large (approximately 85 yards wide and 65 yards deep) and not at all intimate. Then the Athenians began to make smaller theatres that held fewer people that allowed for actors to project their voices throughout the entire room and to control audiences more easily. The Athenians built the Megalopolis and the Agamemnon (which was the only round theatre at the time, all the others were rectangular). Theatres were not only used for theatrics but for various reasons, such as a place for citizens to meet, political assemblies, etc. Later, Athens built the Epidalris. This theatre was built very mathematically (it was greatly influenced by Plato), was built on the bases of a pentagon, and seating was in two rows (prime numbers which w... Free Essays on Theatricallity In The Ancient World Free Essays on Theatricallity In The Ancient World Theatricality in the Ancient World On November 19, Professor William Slater spoke of how theatre was in the ancient world and how it is in modern day. In the medieval days the text was extremely important and in present day it is the other away around – it is dramatics over text. Professor Slater touched on the loss of accent on texts, the influence of archeology on theatre, and the advent of social science on theatre. Firstly, in the past, up until probably about 1970, the text/script given to actors was more so read than it was acted. For example, before you would chose when a character entered and exited. And on the side of the margin it would be written, â€Å"now Helen will exit†. This had to be improved and in coming years, it did, and only got better with time. He also spoke of dynamism. Mainly, the same script and text would be read but with more enthusiasm or more expression. For instance, â€Å"isn’t it a surprise that I’m home?†. Depending on how the text was expressed would make a huge difference on the effect the same text would have, and would basically create better drama. Secondly, he spoke of the influence of archeology on theatre. At first the stages were immensely large (approximately 85 yards wide and 65 yards deep) and not at all intimate. Then the Athenians began to make smaller theatres that held fewer people that allowed for actors to project their voices throughout the entire room and to control audiences more easily. The Athenians built the Megalopolis and the Agamemnon (which was the only round theatre at the time, all the others were rectangular). Theatres were not only used for theatrics but for various reasons, such as a place for citizens to meet, political assemblies, etc. Later, Athens built the Epidalris. This theatre was built very mathematically (it was greatly influenced by Plato), was built on the bases of a pentagon, and seating was in two rows (prime numbers which w...

Word Choice All vs. All Of

Word Choice All vs. All Of Word Choice: All vs. All Of For such a short word, â€Å"all† can be complicated. It certainly has many uses! Here, though, we’re looking at one thing in particular: when to use â€Å"all of† rather than â€Å"all† by itself. Make sure you can avoid errors when using these terms by checking out our guide below. When to Use â€Å"All Of† The sense of â€Å"all† that applies here is its use as a determiner (or a predeterminer when it comes before another determiner). This means using â€Å"all† to indicate how much of something we’re discussing. For example, â€Å"all students† means â€Å"every single student,† not just some of them. As a rule of thumb, we use â€Å"all of† when â€Å"all† is a determiner and the next word in the sentence is a pronoun. When this is a personal pronoun (e.g., me, you, us, them) or a relative pronoun (e.g., whom, which), we need to â€Å"of† to make the sentence grammatical. For example: All of you were late to class. âÅ"“ All you were late to class. âÅ"â€" These are my students, all of whom were late. âÅ"“ These are my students, all whom were late. âÅ"â€" With demonstrative pronouns (e.g., this, these, those), the â€Å"of† is optional: All of these students were late. âÅ"“ All these students were late. âÅ"“ We can also include â€Å"of† before a noun phrase that begins with a determiner, such as the definite article (i.e., the) or a possessive pronoun (e.g., my, his, her, your, our, their). For instance: All of the students overslept. âÅ"“ All the students overslept. âÅ"“ Some style guides recommend leaving out â€Å"of† when it is optional. This will make a sentence more concise, but it is ultimately up to you. When to Use â€Å"All† By Itself So when do we need to use â€Å"all† by itself? As mentioned, you can do this when the next word is a pronoun or determiner. But there are situations when adding the â€Å"of† is not an option. These are: When â€Å"all† comes before a noun referring to an entire class of things. When â€Å"all† is used before an uncountable noun without a determiner (i.e., a noun with no plural form without a word like â€Å"the† or â€Å"my† in front). In the case of an plural noun that refers to an entire class, we would write: All cats are lazy. âÅ"“ All of cats are lazy. âÅ"â€" Here, we use â€Å"all† without â€Å"of† because â€Å"cats† refers to every possible feline, not a specific group of cats. And we would do the same if â€Å"all† came before an uncountable noun: All water is wet. âÅ"“ All of water is wet. âÅ"â€" In both cases, the â€Å"of† is not just unnecessary; it is grammatically incorrect. â€Å"All† as a Pronoun We mentioned above that â€Å"all† is always followed by â€Å"of† when the next word is a personal or relative pronoun. This only applies when â€Å"all† is a determiner. You will also see â€Å"all† used as a pronoun meaning â€Å"everyone,† â€Å"everything,† or â€Å"the only thing.† And when â€Å"all† is a pronoun, it can be combined with other pronouns without using â€Å"of†: This letter is for all whom it may concern. âÅ"“ All you need is love. âÅ"“ These sentences are both fine as â€Å"all† is used as a pronoun, not a determiner. Summary: All or All Of? When deciding whether to write â€Å"all† or â€Å"all of,† keep the following in mind: Use all of when the next word is a personal or relative pronoun. You can use either all or all of when the next word in the sentence is either a demonstrative pronoun or a noun phrase that begins with a determiner. Use all by itself when the next word in the sentence is a plural noun that refers to an entire class of things or an uncountable noun. And don’t forget to have your writing proofread! We will check your writing for errors, and we can even offer feedback on grammar and other issues.